January 31, 2012
Umberto Eco Predicts the Future, 1995

With improvements in telematics and interactive TV, soon each one of us could set up and print at home, using a TV remote control, his own essential daily newspaper, choosing from a myriad of fonts. The dailies might die - but not the publishers of dailies, who would sell information at slashed prices. But a homemade paper could say only what users are interested in, and would cut them off from a flow of potentially stimulating information, judgements, and alerts; it would rob them of the chance to pick up, on leafing through the rest of a conventional newspaper, unexpected or undesired news. We would have an elite of extremely well-informed users, who know where and when to look for news, and a mass of information subproletarians, content with knowing that a calf with two heads has been born in their district, and ignoring the rest of the world.

-Originally published, in Italian, by the Italian Senate, in Gli Incontri di studio a Palazzo Giustiniani: Stampa e mondo politico oggi. Translated by Alastair McEwen for Five Moral Pieces.

Eco mentions on the next page that Al Gore understands the future of the Internet.

January 30, 2012
"As the Bard wrote: “I can change / I can change / I can change / I can change / If it makes you fall in love."

Lana Del Rey, ‘Born to Die’ (Interscope) | SPIN.com

So now we are referring to James Murphy (half-seriously, like the rest of this review) as “the Bard”. Hmm.

January 29, 2012
"Nevermind the mystique; the actual mechanics of pour-overs are more or less those of a broken coffee pot: hot water slowly goes through coffee grounds, making only one cup of coffee at a time. That is all it is! It’s not magic. It’s just kind of a more elaborate, maybe slightly tastier way of brewing coffee. But, you know what? It’s not really suited to pleasing a big crowd, even when it’s the kind of crowd you might think would be predisposed to waiting 20 minutes for a cup of coffee. Because, actually, I do not think that person exists."

The Scourge Of Pour-Over Coffee | The Awl

That person does not exist, and there are some workarounds for this that basically turn the barista (or whatever term you want to use for a coffee-making person) into the coffee version of Lucille Ball and the conveyor belt full of candy.

When done properly, batch brewing tastes as good as by-the-cup pour over, since the parameters that define a good cup of coffee are device-agnostic. The problem is that people (coffee people) wrongly assume that batch brewers are inherently flawed,and cannot possibly produce a good cup of coffee, because the people before them thought the same thing and didn’t bother to adjust the settings. Food people (food writers) think that since the effort put into making a pour over is much more visible that the end result must be better.

There are instances where single-cup brewing is justified. If a shop is offering an expensive coffee whose price prohibits the dumping of old coffee (coffee is old at 30 minutes), then it needs to be brewed to order. If a shop is offering more than one coffee holding 3 full pots of coffee makes little sense if much of that will be wasted. Finally, if a shop does most of its business selling retail (non-brewed) coffee, then samples should be done in very small batches to order.

Brewers are tools, and different tools are appropriate for different situations.

January 23, 2012
"This does nothing to alleviate the main emerging problem: Revolution does not pay. “If this story goes long and gets real, with all the delegations and negotiations, it will become incredibly hard to do this part-time,” Faybisovich says. “And the only people ready to do it full-time are assholes."

The New Decembrists

January 21, 2012
The Evil Economics Of Judging Teachers | The Awl

I really, really like Maria Bustillos’s writing.

January 21, 2012

January 21, 2012

Reception.

January 21, 2012

Cake.

January 21, 2012

Hitched.

January 21, 2012

Waiting. Everyone was late because of the snowstorm.